<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sam Hopper Barrister</title>
	<atom:link href="http://samhopperbarrister.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://samhopperbarrister.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 05:08:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disclaimer of a lease by a landlord&#8217;s liquidator &#8211; Growers granted special leave to appeal by Newsflash &#8211; High Court grants special leave to appeal in Willmott Forests &#8211; disclaimer of leases &#124; Carrie Rome-Sievers, Barrister</title>
		<link>http://samhopperbarrister.com/2013/05/11/disclaimer-of-a-lease-by-a-landlords-liquidator-growers-granted-special-leave-to-appeal/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Newsflash &#8211; High Court grants special leave to appeal in Willmott Forests &#8211; disclaimer of leases &#124; Carrie Rome-Sievers, Barrister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 05:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samhopperbarrister.com/?p=1004#comment-277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] on Austlii. However my friend and colleague Sam Hopper has posted a very useful update on his blog here. Also the parties&#8217; summaries of argument are available online here (scroll down to the table [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on Austlii. However my friend and colleague Sam Hopper has posted a very useful update on his blog here. Also the parties&#8217; summaries of argument are available online here (scroll down to the table [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disclaimer of a lease by the landlord’s liquidator &#8211; part 2 by Disclaimer of a lease by a landlord&#8217;s liquidator &#8211; Growers granted special leave to appeal &#124; Sam Hopper Barrister</title>
		<link>http://samhopperbarrister.com/2012/09/03/disclaimer-of-a-lease-by-the-landlords-liquidator-part-2/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Disclaimer of a lease by a landlord&#8217;s liquidator &#8211; Growers granted special leave to appeal &#124; Sam Hopper Barrister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 02:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samhopperbarrister.com/?p=794#comment-276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] the Court of Appeal&#8217;s decision is subject to a High Court appeal.   However, while the appeal is pending, the decision remains good law.  For the implications of the decision for tenants, have a look at the discussion here; [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the Court of Appeal&#8217;s decision is subject to a High Court appeal.   However, while the appeal is pending, the decision remains good law.  For the implications of the decision for tenants, have a look at the discussion here; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New disclosure statement &#8211; Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) by Notice of Minister&#8217;s decision about the Retail Leases Regulations 2013 (Vic) &#124; Sam Hopper Barrister</title>
		<link>http://samhopperbarrister.com/2011/04/18/new-disclosure-statement-retail-leases-act-2003-vic/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Notice of Minister&#8217;s decision about the Retail Leases Regulations 2013 (Vic) &#124; Sam Hopper Barrister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 03:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samhopperbarrister.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] existing disclosure statement creates difficulties for assigning tenants (see an earlier post here).  An assignors&#8217; disclosure statement has been foreshadowed in the new Regulations.  It is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] existing disclosure statement creates difficulties for assigning tenants (see an earlier post here).  An assignors&#8217; disclosure statement has been foreshadowed in the new Regulations.  It is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New disclosure statement &#8211; Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) by Jolene Barbe</title>
		<link>http://samhopperbarrister.com/2011/04/18/new-disclosure-statement-retail-leases-act-2003-vic/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jolene Barbe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samhopperbarrister.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent work once again. Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent work once again. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New disclosure statement &#8211; Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) by Submissions on the proposed Retail Leases Regulations 2013 and the Regulatory Impact Statement are invited &#124; Sam Hopper Barrister</title>
		<link>http://samhopperbarrister.com/2011/04/18/new-disclosure-statement-retail-leases-act-2003-vic/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Submissions on the proposed Retail Leases Regulations 2013 and the Regulatory Impact Statement are invited &#124; Sam Hopper Barrister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samhopperbarrister.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] One of the interesting issues being considered by the Department is whether there will be a different disclosure statement for assignors of a retail lease (for further discussion on this topic, see an earlier post here). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of the interesting issues being considered by the Department is whether there will be a different disclosure statement for assignors of a retail lease (for further discussion on this topic, see an earlier post here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Retail Leases Amendment Bill 2012 by Updated statutory information brochure on Small Business Commissioner&#8217;s website &#124; Sam Hopper Barrister</title>
		<link>http://samhopperbarrister.com/2012/09/13/retail-tenancies-amendment-bill-2012/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Updated statutory information brochure on Small Business Commissioner&#8217;s website &#124; Sam Hopper Barrister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samhopperbarrister.com/?p=822#comment-214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The brochure has recently been updated in light of the recent amendments to the RLA 2003 (discussed here and here). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The brochure has recently been updated in light of the recent amendments to the RLA 2003 (discussed here and here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Retail Leases Amendment Act 2012 (Vic) commences tomorrow by Updated statutory information brochure on Small Business Commissioner&#8217;s website &#124; Sam Hopper Barrister</title>
		<link>http://samhopperbarrister.com/2012/11/20/retail-leases-amendment-act-2012-vic-commences-tomorrow/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Updated statutory information brochure on Small Business Commissioner&#8217;s website &#124; Sam Hopper Barrister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samhopperbarrister.com/?p=890#comment-213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] brochure has recently been updated in light of the recent amendments to the RLA 2003 (discussed here and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] brochure has recently been updated in light of the recent amendments to the RLA 2003 (discussed here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mark Brennan appointed as inaugural Federal Small Business Commissioner by Steve Simpson</title>
		<link>http://samhopperbarrister.com/2012/10/17/mark-brennan-appointed-as-inaugural-federal-small-business-commissioner/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 22:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samhopperbarrister.com/?p=871#comment-174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fantastic appointment for Mark and industry as a whole.  He will bring commercial common sense to the table as he always done.  Congratulations Mark.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic appointment for Mark and industry as a whole.  He will bring commercial common sense to the table as he always done.  Congratulations Mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Willmott special leave to appeal application filed by Newflash &#8211; Willmott Forests investors mount High Court appeal &#124; Carrie Rome-Sievers, Barrister</title>
		<link>http://samhopperbarrister.com/2012/10/04/willmott-special-leave-to-appeal-application-filed/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Newflash &#8211; Willmott Forests investors mount High Court appeal &#124; Carrie Rome-Sievers, Barrister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 04:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samhopperbarrister.com/?p=844#comment-167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Australian Financial Review article is here, and credit must go to my friend and colleague Sam Hopper for noting this development; his post is here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Australian Financial Review article is here, and credit must go to my friend and colleague Sam Hopper for noting this development; his post is here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disclaimer of a lease by the landlord&#8217;s liquidator does not extinguish the tenant&#8217;s property by Willmott special leave to appeal application filed &#124; Sam Hopper Barrister</title>
		<link>http://samhopperbarrister.com/2012/02/09/disclaimer-of-a-lease-not-possible-by-the-landlords-liquidator/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willmott special leave to appeal application filed &#124; Sam Hopper Barrister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 04:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samhopperbarrister.wordpress.com/?p=649#comment-166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] For more discussion on the decision, refer to earlier posts here and here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For more discussion on the decision, refer to earlier posts here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
