Author Archives | Sam Hopper

Sam Hopper's avatar

About %s

Sam is a retail and commercial property and insolvency barrister at the Victorian Bar.

‘Use’ in an Alpine lease defined

December 15, 2011

1 Comment

‘Use’ of an Alpine sub-lease was defined today by Judge Kennedy in the County Court of Victoria as requiring the sub-tenant to physically occupy the premises. In Evans & Ors v Thurau [2011] VCC 1444, two sub-tenants were required under the terms of their sub-leases to make their alpine apartments available for use by the general […]

Continue reading...

Relief from forfeiture III – Lontav Pty Ltd v Pineross Custodial Services Pty Ltd [2011] VSC 278 (Hargreaves J)

December 12, 2011

0 Comments

This is the next post in my series on relief from forfeiture.  There are two recent cases of relief from forfeiture between the parties to the above decision, both relating to the same lease.  This post considers the first of those cases. There were issues in the case over whether the tenant was in breach […]

Continue reading...

Summary judgment for possession easier under Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic) – Dattner v Wharton [2011] VSC 610

December 1, 2011

0 Comments

A client of mine received summary judgment for possession in an interesting case today. The judgment suggests that it is harder for a rogue tenant to resist summary judgment for possession since the introduction of the Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic). In today’s case: the defendant had entered into a vendor’s terms contract; both the […]

Continue reading...

Relief against forfeiture II – Lorgenredlich Pty Ltd v Cappadona (Retail Tenancies) [2011] VCAT 1668

December 1, 2011

0 Comments

This is the next post in my series on recent cases on relief from forfeiture. I will be posting some comments on lessons learned from these cases in a later post. The material facts of this case are: the tenant had made a previous application for relief from forfeiture in September 2009, which was granted […]

Continue reading...

Recent cases on costs under the Retail Leases Act 2003 – Part II

November 29, 2011

0 Comments

In Burd & Cooper Pty Ltd (ACN 119 808 034) v C & P Cooper Pty Ltd (ACN 119 813 133) and Ors (Retail Tenancies) [2011] VCAT 1416, the tenant filed a counterclaim based on an alleged payment to the landlord of $210,000, then withdrew the counterclaim at the 11th hour before trial. The landlord sought […]

Continue reading...

Recent cases on costs under the Retail Leases Act 2003 – Part I

November 28, 2011

0 Comments

The Tribunal has handed down two interesting cases on costs in the retail tenancies list in the last few weeks. In Jones and Anor v Globeoz Consultant Pty Ltd and Anor (Retail Tenancies) [2011] VCAT 2102, Senior Member Walker ordered the respondent to pay costs under s 92 of the RLA 2003 because it failed to […]

Continue reading...

Surrender and re-grant leading to recovery of land tax

November 17, 2011

0 Comments

In an interesting recent judgment, Richmond Football Club was able to recover a significant amount of land tax paid under a retail lease. The Tribunal held that a deed of variation constituted a surrender and re-grant of the lease and that the re-granted lease was a retail premises lease under the RLA 2003.  Consequently, there […]

Continue reading...

Relief against forfeiture – V & O Princi Pty Ltd v Prestige Holdings Group Pty Ltd & Anor [2010] VSC 627

November 14, 2011

0 Comments

The next few posts on this site will consider some recent cases on relief from forfeiture. The decision of Mukhtar AsJ can be found here. The material facts are: the tenant had acquired a car wash business at the leased premises and was in breach of numerous covenants under the lease, including being in arrears of […]

Continue reading...

CPD Breakfast Briefing – Property Law – The Retail Leases Act and Recent Developments in Relief against Forfeiture – 3 November 2011

October 28, 2011

0 Comments

I am presenting a paper on recent developments in relief against forfeiture as part of the Greens List breakfast briefing series. My paper will be presented from 7.45 on 3 November 2011 at Level 1, 205 William Street, Melbourne. I will be talking about: some recent cases in which relief against forfeiture has been obtain […]

Continue reading...

FEA decision – special leave application filed

October 18, 2011

0 Comments

In earlier posts here and here I have discussed the FEA decisions about the whether the words ‘without any deduction whatsoever‘ in a rental covenant are sufficient to exclude an equitable set-off. An application for special leave to appeal from the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court to the High Court of Australia has been filed […]

Continue reading...