Many readers will be familiar with the Ministerial determination that excludes lease with a term of 15 years or more (and certain other related leases) from the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic). For those who are not, a copy of that determination is available by following the link here. The 15 year determination has been a […]
Archive | Property / leasing RSS feed for this archive
Application of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) to leases of 15 years or more: LFRACM INC v Halski Pty Ltd [2025] VCC 1506
Application of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic): a step-by-step guide
October 28, 2025
With land tax increasing and its consequential effect on rent, more and more tenants are turning their minds to the question of whether the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) applies to their leases. A few month ago, fellow barrister Ben Kelly and I presented a paper on this topic to the Legal Practitioners Liability Committee. […]
Landmark decision about exit fees and rent charged to dead residents in over-55s land lease communities
July 9, 2025
A group of residents were successful this week in an application brought against the operators of the Wollert Lifestyle Community (Lifestyle). The application concerned the validity of exit fees in residents’ Residential Site Agreements (RSA) and covenants that allow rent to be charged after a resident dies. Residents typically buy a home from Lifestyle and […]
Setting off a damages claim when the lease contains a ‘no deductions’ clause
June 10, 2025
Tenants with rent in arrears often try to reduce those arrears by setting them off against some other claim against the landlord. This has caused many landlords to introduce covenants that require the rent to be paid ‘without deductions’ or words to that effect. While a contractual exclusion of set-off is generally effective, in the […]
The Supreme Court has held that caps ARE permissible in retail premises leases
December 20, 2024
In the decision of Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Northcote Shopping Centre Pty Ltd [2024] VSC 799 handed down this morning, Croft J has held that ‘caps’, or upper limits on rent reviews are permitted by sub-s 35(2) of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic). This decision overturns the VCAT decision in Northcote Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v […]
Repaint and re-carpet clause is not a keep in repair clause and therefore, not contrary to s 52 of the RLA 2003 … or is it?
October 31, 2024
In a decision handed down this week, the Tribunal held that an obligation in a retail premises lease to repaint and re-carpet periodically is not inconsistent with the landlord’s obligation to maintain the premises under s 52 of the RLA 2003. In the decision of Deng and Deng Pty Ltd v McPhee and Anor […]
Another case from VCAT saying that a cap on a market rent review does not comply with sub-s 35(2) of the RLA 2003
September 5, 2024
VCAT just published another decision in which a Tribunal member held that market rent review cause with a ‘cap’does not comply with sub-s 35(2) of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) (RLA 2003). In the case of Cote Noire Pty Ltd v Roberts Family Enterprises Pty Ltd (Building and Property) 2024 VCAT 810 Deputy President Riegler considered […]
An interesting VCAT decision about the operation of s 28 of the Retail Leases Act 2003
September 2, 2024
Acting Senior Member Nash at VCAT today handed down an interesting decision about the operation of s 28 of the RLA 2003 in the case of Pagica Pty Ltd atf the Oscinah Trust v Inlet Property Pty Ltd (Building and Property) [2024] VCAT 830. In summary, the Tribunal found that: a s 28 notice is […]
Another interesting case about s 35 of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) – part 2
August 13, 2024
In an earlier post here I discussed another decision from VCAT holding that rent review by CPI or to the current market rent with a ‘cap‘ on increases is inconsistent with s 35(2) of the RLA 2003. A number of readers have told me that they are following this issue closely and I noted on […]
A default notice is not void if it fails to allow for abatement of rent – but what is a tenant to do if the abatement is disputed?
August 7, 2024
In the recent decision of Club Fogolar Furlan Melbourne v Paramount Investments Group Pty Ltd [2024] VSC 208 in the Supreme Court of Victoria, Croft J considered whether a default notice alleging arrears of rent could be valid if it did not make an allowance for abatement of rent claimed by the tenant under s 57 of the Retail […]

November 12, 2025
0 Comments