A few people have requested a copy of the reasons in the recent County Court decision in Evans & Ors v Thurau Pty Ltd [2011] VCC 1444 on the meaning of the word ‘use’ in an Alpine lease. An earlier post on the decision is available here. The decision has not made its way to AustLii […]

Further to yesterday’s post, Australian listed companies and their subsidiaries are excluded from the Act (see s 4(2)(c) of the RLA). This is consistent with the purpose of the RLA to be a form of consumer protection for small businesses. Section 4(2)(d) of the RLA states that leases of the following premises are not retail premises […]

In a Victorian Government Gazette entry today, the Minister for Innovation, Services and Small Business determined that premises the tenant of which is a company (or a subsidiary of such a company) registered on the New Zealand Stock Exchange Ltd is excluded from the operation of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic). The determination has […]

‘Use’ of an Alpine sub-lease was defined today by Judge Kennedy in the County Court of Victoria as requiring the sub-tenant to physically occupy the premises. In Evans & Ors v Thurau [2011] VCC 1444, two sub-tenants were required under the terms of their sub-leases to make their alpine apartments available for use by the general […]

This is the next post in my series on relief from forfeiture.  There are two recent cases of relief from forfeiture between the parties to the above decision, both relating to the same lease.  This post considers the first of those cases. There were issues in the case over whether the tenant was in breach […]

A client of mine received summary judgment for possession in an interesting case today. The judgment suggests that it is harder for a rogue tenant to resist summary judgment for possession since the introduction of the Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic). In today’s case: the defendant had entered into a vendor’s terms contract; both the […]

This is the next post in my series on recent cases on relief from forfeiture. I will be posting some comments on lessons learned from these cases in a later post. The material facts of this case are: the tenant had made a previous application for relief from forfeiture in September 2009, which was granted […]

In Burd & Cooper Pty Ltd (ACN 119 808 034) v C & P Cooper Pty Ltd (ACN 119 813 133) and Ors (Retail Tenancies) [2011] VCAT 1416, the tenant filed a counterclaim based on an alleged payment to the landlord of $210,000, then withdrew the counterclaim at the 11th hour before trial. The landlord sought […]

The Tribunal has handed down two interesting cases on costs in the retail tenancies list in the last few weeks. In Jones and Anor v Globeoz Consultant Pty Ltd and Anor (Retail Tenancies) [2011] VCAT 2102, Senior Member Walker ordered the respondent to pay costs under s 92 of the RLA 2003 because it failed to […]

In an interesting recent judgment, Richmond Football Club was able to recover a significant amount of land tax paid under a retail lease. The Tribunal held that a deed of variation constituted a surrender and re-grant of the lease and that the re-granted lease was a retail premises lease under the RLA 2003.  Consequently, there […]