Business records provided to assignee – s 60(1)(d) of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic)

May 27, 2011

Property / leasing

Some people hold the view that a statement that accords with s. 52 of the Estate Agents Act 1980 (Vic) will be sufficient to satisfy s. 60(1)(d) of the RLA (section 60(1) is extracted in my earlier post today).

However:

  1. the RLA does not define a “business record”;
  2. a s. 52 statement is a form completed by the vendor of a business and it is not clear that this would be a business record for the purposes of s. 60(1)(d); and
  3. in any event, s. 52 statements allow for data in the preceding two years, not three as required by s. 60(1)(d) (although this could be remedied by amending the form).

Consequently, solicitors should think twice before advising their clients that completing a s 52 statement will satisfy s 60(1)(d).

About Sam Hopper

Sam is a property and insolvency barrister.

View all posts by Sam Hopper

Subscribe

Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: