Author Archives | Sam Hopper

Sam Hopper's avatar

About %s

Sam is a retail and commercial property and insolvency barrister at the Victorian Bar.

Do tenants still need mortgagee’s consent to lease in light of the Willmott decision?

December 9, 2013

0 Comments

  A few solicitors have asked whether, in light of the High Court’s decision in Willmott last week (discussed here), tenants still need to insist on the consent of their landlord’s mortgagee before taking a lease. The answer is ‘yes‘. The High Court’s decision in Willmott recognises that a landlord’s liquidator has the power to extinguish a lease.  It does not […]

Continue reading...

Willmott appeal dismissed – landlord’s Liquidators may disclaim leases

December 4, 2013

2 Comments

  The High Court today found that Liquidators of a landlord company can use the disclaimer power in the Corporations Act to extinguish leases granted by that company. A summary of the decision is available here. The decision upholds a decision of the Victorian Court of Appeal that has created significant consternation among those acting for […]

Continue reading...

Is a franchisee’s outlet licence a retail premises lease?

October 22, 2013

3 Comments

In an interesting recent decision from the Supreme Court,[1] Croft J held that an arbitration clause in a retail leases does not oust the Tribunal’s jurisdiction. A detailed discussion of this issue can be found on Robert Hay’s blog here and here. The Court also referred to a finding at first instance that the franchisee’s […]

Continue reading...

Management fees – Practice Note for LIV’s November 2012 lease revision

October 21, 2013

0 Comments

Robert Hay and Derry Devine of the Law Institute of Victoria’s Leases Committee have written a practice note about an issue with the November 2012 edition of the LIV’s standard lease. Any practitioner using the November 2012 revision of that LIV standard lease should be aware of the practice note, which states that: “When using […]

Continue reading...

Costs of essential safety measures and s 251 of the Building Act

October 2, 2013

1 Comment

Whether a landlord can pass on the costs of complying with the Building Act 1993 has been the source of a significant debate over the last year or so. A recent article of mine on this issue has been published in the Law Institute Journal here. In summary, the article suggests that: the better view […]

Continue reading...

Is a stated intention to exercise an option sufficient to create a new agreement to lease? Part 2

September 5, 2013

0 Comments

A recent VCAT decision, discussed here, discussed a decision in which a letter stating that the tenant intended to exercise its option was equivocal and did not create a binding contract between the parties. In a recent decision from the Magistrates Court of Victoria, Magistrate Ginnane considered a similarly worded letter signed by the tenant […]

Continue reading...

Service station leases – a Victorian perspective

September 4, 2013

4 Comments

A colleague recently sent me this excellent article by Bill Burrough from DibbsBarker titled ‘Service station lease: Ensuring the lease is manageable and saleable’. The article talks about: leasing issues for investors considering a service station – an investment considered by some to be ‘recession proof’;  and the obligation to maintain the service station infrastructure […]

Continue reading...

What is a retail premises? The ultimate consumer test.

September 3, 2013

0 Comments

Here is an excellent summary by Robert Hay of the recent decision of Fitzroy Dental Pty Ltd v Metropolitan Management Pty Ltd [2013] VSC 344 . As many of you know, a retail sale is generally considered to be a sale to the ultimate consumer.  The question in that case was whether the conference provider or the attendees at […]

Continue reading...

Willmott appeal heard

August 13, 2013

0 Comments

Last Friday, 9 August 2013, the High Court heard an appeal against the Victorian Court of Appeal’s decision in Willmott Forests Ltd (Receivers and Managers appointed)(in liquidation) v Willmott Growers Group Inc and Willmott Action Group Inc [2012] VSCA 202. For those following the development of the case, the transcript of the hearing can be […]

Continue reading...

Waving goodbye to waiver

August 13, 2013

1 Comment

Originally posted on Equity, Trusts and More:
It’s been almost five years since the High Court confirmed that Australian law does not recognise a standalone legal doctrine of waiver, Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner (2008) 238 CLR 570.  Waiver is really a shorthand description of the result of the doctrines of election, estoppel,…

Continue reading...