Author Archives | Sam Hopper

Sam Hopper's avatar

About %s

Sam is a retail and commercial property and insolvency barrister at the Victorian Bar.

Robert Hay’s post – Breach of s 52 can amount to repudiatory conduct

October 3, 2011

0 Comments

My friend Robert Hay just added a post to his blog on a new decision in which VCAT held that a landlord repudiated the lease by failing to comply with its repair and maintenance obligations under s 52 of the RLA. Read Robert’s post here. VCAT’s decision is available here. Acceptance of the landlord’s repudiation […]

Continue reading...

Link to article on disclosure to WA retail tenants

September 29, 2011

0 Comments

Here is a link to an article reporting that the WA Parliament is debating the introduction of mandatory disclosure requirements to prospective retail tenants. The article suggests that landlords in WA require tenants to disclose their turnover figures and that landlords may be obliged under the proposed legislation to disclose rents (presumably for comparable premises) […]

Continue reading...

Recent press over shopping centre leases

September 26, 2011

1 Comment

In the past week or so a debate has been brewing between shopping centre retailers and landlords, fuelled by comments made in the media by Mark McInnes and Solomon Lew of Premier Investments. McInnes is employing a strategy of closing stores to reduce losses in his ‘ongoing cost-reduction program’.   In some cases where Premier Investments […]

Continue reading...

New Greens List website with useful resources

September 21, 2011

0 Comments

Greens List (my clerk) has just launched a new website with resources that followers of this blog might be interested in. Michael Green had this to say about the new site: Especially valuable to solicitors is the library with over 90 papers in it, many of which can have been filmed and can be viewed. There is […]

Continue reading...

Adverse possession of disused laneways

September 16, 2011

0 Comments

Solicitors with clients who possess old laneways should consider lodging caveats to protect their clients’ possessory title and making an adverse possession application to the Registrar or Titles as soon as possible. Under s 7B of the Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic): 7B            No title by adverse possession against Councils  (1) Despite any rule […]

Continue reading...

Relief from forfeiture of a franchise agreement

September 7, 2011

1 Comment

Many retail operators occupy their shops under a franchise agreement and outlet licence granted to them by the franchisor who holds a head lease of the property.   As it is usually associated with terminated leases, relief from forfeiture is often overlooked by both franchisors and franchisees when a franchise agreement and outlet licence are terminated. […]

Continue reading...

Goods left on leased premises

August 29, 2011

0 Comments

Robert Hay has just put an interesting post on his blog about a change to the legislation regarding goods left on the premises after termination of a lease – see here. The potential problem with the statute that Robert has identified emphasises that it is prudent for landlords to ensure that leases contains a clause […]

Continue reading...

Key-money and assignments under the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic)

August 25, 2011

0 Comments

Section 23 of the RLA prohibits the landlord from seeking or accepting payment of key-money.  It is a penalty provision. “Key-money” is defined in s. 3 of the RLA as: money that a tenant is to pay, or a benefit that a tenant is to give, that is- (a)            by way of a premium, or something […]

Continue reading...

Standard of repair under s 52 of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic)

August 23, 2011

0 Comments

Section 52(2) of the RLA 2003 creates a ‘keep in repair’ covenant.  The landlord is required under s 52 to keep the premises in a condition consistent with the condition of the premises when the retail premises lease was entered into. In Computer & Parts Land Pty Ltd v Aust-China Yan Tai Pty Ltd [2010] […]

Continue reading...

Paying rent “without deduction” – the Full Court decision in Norman; re Forest Enterprises Limited v FEA Plantations Ltd [2011] FCAFC 99

August 9, 2011

3 Comments

The Full Court of the Federal Court today handed down its decision in the FEA case.  A copy of the court’s reasons is available here. The case is discussed on an earlier post here. In summary, the Full Court: discussed the legal principles surrounding equitable set-off (paragraphs [135] to [163]); for reasons not relevant to […]

Continue reading...