VCAT recently held that s 92 of the RLA 2003 prevents recovery of costs in a dispute between landlord and tenant of a retail premises lease of less than one year. Section 12 of the RLA 2003 states that the Act does not apply to retail premises leases of less than 1 year. However, the […]
Author Archives | Sam Hopper
Article – interview of Mark McInnes
August 8, 2011
Here is a record of an interview with Mark McInnes, former head of David Jones and current head of Premier Retail, discussing the closure of 50 stores in the Just Group announced recently. The interview contains commentary on the retail sector, and the future of retail tenancies in particular, including: comment on centres that are […]
Some comments on the new disclosure statement under the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic)
August 5, 2011
As most readers are aware, Victoria has had a new disclosure statement under the RLA 2003 since 1 January 2011. A copy of the regulations with the new disclosure statement can be found here. I previously posted some comments on the new disclosure statement here. I have been looking at this again recently and have set […]
Liability of replacement RE for damages for breach of the lease. Primary RE Ltd v Great Southern Property Holdings Ltd & Ors [2011] VSC 242
July 28, 2011
The final comments made by the Court in the Primary RE case related to the potential liability of Primary RE to a claim for damages for breach of the lease that accrued prior to its appointment as replacement RE. This argument appears to arise out of the operation of s 601FS (discussed in more detail […]
Multi-scheme leases. Primary RE Ltd v Great Southern Property Holdings Ltd & Ors [2011] VSC 242
July 25, 2011
Another issue in the Primary RE case was whether a replacement RE can seek relief from forfeiture of part only of a terminated lease. Primary RE was appointed as replacement RE for only the 2007 scheme. However, some of the leased land was used for other schemes as well. Consequently, Primary RE would be able […]
Relief would not have been granted in any event – Primary RE Ltd v Great Southern Property Holdings Ltd & Ors [2011] VSC 242
July 20, 2011
In the Primary RE case, the Court held that relief from forfeiture would not have been granted in any event. The Court (see para [196]): did not accept that the financial prospects of a restructured scheme is a significant factor in the exercise of the Court’s discretion; and accepted that the interests of the investors […]
Managed Investment Scheme discussion paper
July 15, 2011
The Federal Government recently published a discussion paper on Managed Investment Schemes. The discussion paper arises out of recent high profile collapsed managed investment schemes and raises issues in relation to the transfer of a viable MIS, restructuring a potentially viable MIS and winding up a non-viable MIS. A copy of the discussion paper is […]
Does the replacement RE take its claim subject to equities against the old RE? Primary RE Ltd v Great Southern Property Holdings Ltd & Ors [2011] VSC 242
July 12, 2011
In the Primary RE case, the new RE sought relief from forfeiture of leases terminated following breaches of the lease by the former RE. The landlord argued that the former RE would have been estopped from seeking relief from forfeiture because it had failed to make an application for relief from forfeiture following service of […]
Does a right to seek relief from forfeiture transfer under ss 601FS and 601FT of the Corporations Act? Primary RE Ltd v Great Southern Property Holdings Ltd & Ors [2011] VSC 242
July 8, 2011
Primary RE replaced the old Great Southern RE of the schemes in this litigation. Under s 601FS of the Corporations Act: If the responsible entity of a registered scheme changes, the rights, obligations and liabilities of the former responsible entity in relation to the scheme become rights, obligations and liabilities of the new responsible entity. […]
Exercising an option out of time: Weemah Park Pty Ltd v Glenlaton Investments Pty Ltd [2011] QCA 150 (24 June 2011)
July 5, 2011
In a recent Queensland Court of Appeal decision, the tenant had purported to exercise its option out of time. The Court upheld the primary judge’s finding that: the purported exercise of an option out of time constituted an offer by the tenant to enter a new lease on the same terms as the option; and […]

August 9, 2011
0 Comments