Author Archives | Sam Hopper

Sam Hopper's avatar

About %s

Sam is a retail and commercial property and insolvency barrister at the Victorian Bar.

“Hotel” does not require accomodation

May 31, 2011

2 Comments

Deputy President Macnamara at VCAT recently held that a permitted purpose in a lease provided as “hotel” was synonymous with “pub”, and that the term “hotel” in modern parlance does not necessarily mean the tenant must provide accommodation. This is useful for people settling leases of pubs and hotels. However, it does not address the […]

Continue reading...

Business records provided to assignee – s 60(1)(d) of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic)

May 27, 2011

0 Comments

Some people hold the view that a statement that accords with s. 52 of the Estate Agents Act 1980 (Vic) will be sufficient to satisfy s. 60(1)(d) of the RLA (section 60(1) is extracted in my earlier post today). However: the RLA does not define a “business record”; a s. 52 statement is a form […]

Continue reading...

Withholding consent to assignment of a retail premises lease

May 27, 2011

0 Comments

Under the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) a landlord is only entitled to withhold consent to an assignment in the circumstances set out in s. 60(1), which says: (1) A landlord is only entitled to withhold consent to the assignment of a retail premises lease if one or more of the following applies— (a)   the […]

Continue reading...

Cross-referencing error in s 62 of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic)

May 20, 2011

3 Comments

There is a well known cross-referencing error in s. 62 of the RLA.  It refers to s. 61(4), when it should refer to s. 61(5A).  The error resulted from an amendment to the statute in 2005, but continues to be a source of confusion for many solicitors. That this is a cross-referencing error and should […]

Continue reading...

Can the costs of repair and maintenance be recovered as an outgoing?

May 20, 2011

9 Comments

Until the decision of Deputy President Macnamara in Café Dansk Pty Ltd v Shiel & Ors [2009] VCAT 36, it was widely believed that landlords were responsible for conducting repair and maintenance at leased premises but that those costs could be passed on to tenants as outgoings under the terms of the lease. The belief […]

Continue reading...

The danger of WorkSafe notices when repair and maintenance is required

May 20, 2011

0 Comments

I am asked occasionally whether by both landlords and tenants whether they should call a WorkSafe inspector to serve a notice on the other party who is refusing to complete certain works on the property.  In summary, I think it is a very bad idea. Section 26 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic) (OHS […]

Continue reading...

Setting off costs of capital works

May 12, 2011

3 Comments

If a lease is silent, the common law does not imply against either a landlord or a tenant an obligation to perform capital works on leased property. This has been the source of a significant dispute, as the tenant usually carries the immediate commercial risk if the building is run down, yet the landlord gains […]

Continue reading...

Is an eBay business a retail premises?

April 27, 2011

0 Comments

A colleague has just referred me to an interesting decision by Judge Ginnane in the County Court on whether a lease for premises in which an eBay business is conducted is a retail premises lease under the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic). The Court concluded for various reasons that it could not be satisfied that […]

Continue reading...

New disclosure statement – Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic)

April 18, 2011

7 Comments

A new disclosure statement under the Retail Leases Regulations 2003 (Vic) came into operation on 1 January 2011. When a draft of the disclosure statement was first circulated, I made the following comments in a practice note: Attached is a link to a letter sent from Roger Arwas at DIIRD to the Shopping Centre Council […]

Continue reading...

Section 146 notices, relief against forfeiture and ss 601FS and 601FT of the Corporations Act

April 15, 2011

3 Comments

Justice Judd in the Victorian Supreme Court is currently reserved on an application by Primary RE Ltd seeking either to preserve leases that were granted to the responsible entity in some of the Great Southern managed investment schemes or for relief against forfeiture of those leases. Primary RE Ltd is a responsible entity that was […]

Continue reading...